- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old2 p- @" j1 r# P* H- y6 p' W
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical
5 _* x3 ?3 S+ ?4 c( M3 W! zExposure to Testosterone
- z" b* A: N+ XSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,25 Y; a1 E% ~% _$ y2 i
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1+ H7 v0 Z5 I/ U0 k+ H, f
Clinical Pediatrics! z2 T4 C! _' U7 N3 h# E
Volume 46 Number 6
# U, x w5 q+ o4 _July 2007 540-5439 ~" i/ e# q" }+ R1 [5 h. h
© 2007 Sage Publications
/ d; A: \) H! F3 J* j1 s7 |8 t10.1177/00099228062966510 A. Q% x' I- E
http://clp.sagepub.com S' R; _6 N' Q8 a V1 Y( y9 `6 I
hosted at
/ g: c9 ]# R3 K/ w$ Mhttp://online.sagepub.com
2 ~: x) h) f4 v, ^' @' j5 n7 Y; ~Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,! K( |2 N+ x# Q4 {
is a significant concern for physicians. Central/ R B1 }9 Z7 `- b; Q1 x
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated1 l4 S$ D/ }, a) L9 z: N7 c
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has4 V+ w, V! i6 b% m+ r+ O& k" B7 t
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system8 K$ V9 f9 J) w, Y( J
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
7 k, ~0 |* b% \. q, a' ~1 dby enlargement of the penis, development of pubic9 K2 O* d: u; J
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
. J. f8 } L, h( ^cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
& o' l4 [$ t! X O: M/ treport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
2 f0 k, D& z nenlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
$ I: O: x7 O3 M/ r, N# `5 Z& Kment without testicular enlargement, which was due+ @# f' C* {$ M8 {
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
* z8 q6 N6 B7 F! f) a) Mthe father. The family initially concealed this infor-
, b* F. {" t5 ?' Z5 \mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this% i- O ~8 x7 @0 Y2 J+ C
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of
1 n. s9 J3 X5 u$ i4 n% ftestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
8 D- S4 n+ O% C1 h. B. Wbly more common than the rare case report in the4 E5 L& i+ y6 e) |- Y
literature.4
; W0 K0 o: u5 p* M. A7 vPatient Report
/ h6 q# s" D) n' @, qA 16-month-old white child was referred to the
! A7 |: J+ T: r4 cendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern: z& O+ E! \/ @7 D. H" q( |
of early sexual development. His mother noticed
' ~% D! n5 S/ w9 A* Wlight colored pubic hair development when he was7 A+ n! M, j7 s2 j0 o0 @& ~/ q. w" C
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
! }! B& f8 r/ p! I) Z7 ^South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
1 |. ?' R' Q6 D% n' ]. w2 }Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
% |- {/ l, J$ z" ~9 P$ ~# xProfessor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of) J3 c$ S2 X, G) P/ N4 s/ Y8 [
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;5 a. h$ Z8 f, ]1 f1 S
e-mail: [email protected].! @5 ^/ U6 g; ?1 b
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
- u* [! f: d6 k- Y" `: V6 V: ddarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
, ~" p* k/ ~4 x) A; _1 G4 Pment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
. W9 c, ~* R5 L2 [! Vwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with. K1 N4 ]3 o) U1 b
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
# P7 d( r; w5 a& X5 a# H2 ]/ ~20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
* u/ p0 i, t3 H6 ]' ^" bof life and was still receiving breast milk along with
2 k) A5 F O6 Z+ h) x2 \- fsolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,' b% c* Q) s+ r" M5 }2 O8 t
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development
- _5 z" q5 e9 gwas age appropriate.9 }- q0 _7 ?. ~+ F% W1 ?
The family history was remarkable for the father,
3 {; j# b! R) ^* q" w3 Ywho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
$ g6 Q e! `0 g6 l5 R1 Hwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s4 ]/ {9 E4 w4 e& ~
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
1 R3 P: y1 U, Z7 s r7 {1 vearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.: `/ t/ @. k$ |9 Q) w+ U9 e
The father denied taking any other medication. The
6 \- v2 f) e$ o7 Ichild’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
7 p) L! p9 }7 o* l+ d) ~was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet4 S6 b6 i$ }4 A& h
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-! A; _& Z5 P* V# I& t7 i
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-8 a6 _' W% H0 P# G4 O
tives. There were no siblings.- m& R) H N& X+ E
Physical Examination
- P1 `# R: q6 X4 BThe physical examination revealed a very active,, u% z3 J: \; ?0 _% r: F
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
4 C$ u7 |: U. J0 E- ga blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was* |7 n5 j+ K7 |/ u* k
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
% L% D6 m( G" B! z(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth2 T5 J1 `! J8 K& X- m K
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of! Z* C# v) d5 E" g' j( T$ ^
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
& N. o4 m1 B+ W; v* oThe genitourinary examination was remarkable for
1 p, W! i& x1 o* [0 Cenlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
( k. B5 n" B) M2 ^9 m0 C8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well# w A" \& I+ o/ y
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around1 P5 }# {8 H. j: I( r& A: P
540/ R" }% j& W$ f6 K9 \9 ]: m
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from n: ^* ]! D0 l" y6 P4 a" W; _
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
2 G' [; _% s. N: Q6 m( n/ ptesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.4 B A9 w1 r* d, H7 F8 M
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat$ d2 Z& S- J/ M, Q
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no" X ]8 C/ p; O/ y% {( F
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
& `% i' L2 h8 k$ c9 }1 F) C. ~Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+- K0 k: @, `3 t, @/ I/ @, \0 u
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
/ ?# A! I/ O# ~5 l9 ~5 l) Uof papilledema.4 |) [( w& v- d7 H
Laboratory Evaluation
' T6 G' d! c3 }" d* iThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by# u2 f7 |" w3 o( g8 O: |0 |
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-/ X! j: c2 n3 V3 e5 @4 K# F
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
0 l! r1 O& Z! { p. N5 H" wkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test2 ]; @( d- @% E( }
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
9 M& H& G/ c' ?6 @8 a# ?& ylating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).' [9 S3 k. x0 q0 B" ]
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood
7 ~5 o% a$ R0 b7 Jurea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
, t7 r! r7 T) F1 `within normal range for his age. The concentration
9 g5 J/ _/ y9 ~( l+ G+ Z2 nof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
$ A9 I/ [' z1 \3 h1 b3 Q& H2 t(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
) e3 y& {+ J6 h) \- |$ rng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
" R7 f# K: w2 rterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
0 A& J0 x! C! l3 P% S4 kdesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
' j- U6 d" ]) L# I$ v49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
- x, ]$ n" d: d, u5 iwas 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-1 t) }8 w8 p' r" W! y0 K7 H! {
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total, [/ v! \ w3 O4 ]' f2 l" C
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),* v6 c8 f, G! B6 K+ O3 M
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
9 D& w. s6 E' U5 ]+ P7 h5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular x8 w2 r: [9 g4 d- b' w# W% U: ~% p
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone+ Z a* E( Q1 P' P
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL/ g$ y- \9 j+ w* O" h0 Z3 G1 t) c
(prepubertal).
0 I& @8 N, A/ d* P, I* HThe parents were notified about the laboratory
2 l( L5 K! J. g9 ?0 Presults and were informed that all of the tests were# y- J; S6 H3 q; ^7 V
normal except the testosterone level was high. The9 E3 r; Q6 x/ z- a& h
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
; g+ F9 |5 U) }obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-. r- ^) ]6 Q- F: B. z3 {
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
8 Q& e( |3 s4 ?& }6 @1 aPhysical examination at this time revealed that the, O7 q4 h9 Z- P+ R5 m
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
, I# H- ~( P9 l- [7 G2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
3 w M2 I/ F5 G2 `4 b7 I: hunchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
( w. |; F" f4 F3 w/ ^$ lpletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
& I0 b) C3 X) |1 ]4 [the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
3 M- t1 |3 d# f# t9 v0 d. [mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.1 D! \! c, A# B0 Q9 u Q
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-/ y5 h- E, q' y1 X& H5 N9 w
ing frequent erections.
' j. r' c7 L/ a8 MBoth parents were again questioned about use of
# N2 V7 Y9 x' V, S( F- T. W- fany ointment/creams that they may have applied to
: m* d: T) m% y+ q- l2 R Kthe child’s skin. This time the father admitted the( z$ m' I+ D$ T
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541' E7 I8 s$ Q; B5 b+ I. Q7 d
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
) d' G9 Q2 F' jing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for" s [+ }8 ~6 N6 H* @
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed% T8 d2 _% x- y) @5 i+ }% E0 ^4 T
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-8 L. @( H4 K) D b2 E
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
' `8 x) A( U7 l/ z0 x* ?& J$ vsecondary to depression.
0 ^( l1 `3 ]/ S8 L! mThe child slept in the same bed with parents.0 m; _/ {( g! C- o) F+ R
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his. M( L& W) T- V3 X- }
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
D+ j) D$ g" z& g8 Nnificant bare skin contact between baby and father.- X5 N$ _8 J( |( r" a# Z
The father also admitted that after the phone call,
6 G. C; n; l4 {. v, m$ M. r( ewhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby
' L; |: l4 h! e Vwas high, he then read the product information
: G! c+ G; _* g% P( H4 npacket and concluded that it was most likely the rea-2 M' E0 F* @: Z) ?
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they) C) d6 z% _2 w% X) s4 U0 [
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
! I2 s* v) L! H a+ e5 c5 g; Q# `father was not hugging him with bare skin and had- g% e! o$ W7 h' s' N
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone4 @' N! I* X' j, a- t9 ~" K% ]
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the
9 o; P l( j% `$ i3 ulaboratory to obtain the test.& r5 x( j; F3 v
Discussion I& k0 H2 l2 o# f
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary" ?( X4 q4 p6 `( T) L
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
8 L1 Z6 r# L4 t% M$ M! Z$ KPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when& }5 K, j% L& b0 W
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
" S$ Y3 u5 w: ^5 _6 L: L9 Z' L% L& ethalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
4 ^! B: c0 G& |$ D6 a2 x* Jmon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
3 S2 \' ~$ F; u" T. b9 \' t* bmay have a central nervous system lesion that is
5 u# p9 M4 ?" t2 d7 W; E# b" vresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
8 i4 C; h% d3 _/ |) {; I tamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-( ?# \6 b3 S5 f* n
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
( ?. S7 F2 ]* E& n2 h- ?' fboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
& R/ [, i2 F# ~" f: Oization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
% m. y. Q" ~) Urical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by: `! a$ t5 n. w
gonadotropins.1,3, ~9 z1 r/ s/ x* t
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
9 n7 S( h4 e0 |, l' m2 d' Mcious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate2 Z/ `5 J: f a6 q) O+ ?
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or
/ C8 X, f- A7 I$ M2 Zexogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
. z% M8 _4 B$ T2 F4 Mulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
) R" m5 w4 S( i8 M9 J* Wcongenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
. r, X) ^& X5 _- Zadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
4 i& `7 v' _0 R$ ^8 upuberty in boys.3,44 {' Q/ J3 J2 w1 ~% s( I
The most common form of congenital adrenal
9 k6 d+ U2 ?. ~3 {* bhyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
! l) s; R( u; h1 S VThe 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in$ F, G- S1 s* g& v U
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
" k8 [) Y+ T* U8 q6 I0 I wan adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen! P4 d% Z7 F# n6 a
excess.1,30 V3 U& `! N# e8 D9 e3 {: b
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from& F. O0 \% H4 @, k) A. s3 I; O' w
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007$ i, `7 F2 i3 q+ _
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-- @6 x w0 a4 ~" f4 ] f6 A* o
independent precocious puberty, which is also known: U8 |% N0 l5 ~: W/ `
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
+ N- g/ D- z* F# X8 Z, Z/ ~: w/ ]very young age. The physical findings in these boys$ e( n( B) l+ a% Q: l& u
with this disorder are full pubertal development,
6 O! ~8 P5 d7 [5 Rincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
# l2 ^( f' u3 i& uwith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder$ N9 M% r% F, E( \/ B7 l
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show& w, w. ]4 l% x
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
8 o: M u; N+ w, I' {releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
# I% {$ s% Q$ q7 Eautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
" M& \7 W) e) D# z0 P. r; Jmales; therefore, other male members of the family
5 U0 q6 m3 C4 N+ ?$ ]) R$ }+ l3 Amay have similar precocious puberty.3/ t" d3 P2 o5 \$ S
In our patient, physical examination was incon- j! | u, Y; Y: D' p
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-3 X$ u8 w. }. e% P/ h+ c
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
: g& c7 `- q0 @was in the differential diagnosis because his father
. O0 E4 a" y/ s% O1 Ustarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,* g0 S6 c% J1 N4 ^+ C4 L6 d1 H
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
9 T- ~8 y, N% }4 \beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
2 ~; E+ v! @' U0 d6 T& M1 C$ cative initial history of androgen exposure, our
$ E6 E" z( b) @1 cbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
5 }$ {! P/ g8 r1 }8 r( J& |! feither 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase3 D4 r8 P" k) S
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-, h& S: _' Q( n
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.9 J# Y. r# f* Y" P, Z- r& ?
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly/ g. o7 q4 I) k
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
& d% }9 Y9 q' ] k' m9 mthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-, i( H6 N6 ^$ B" `: e$ h0 T3 [
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
% a( u2 i+ H0 h0 g6 f- x. [decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-0 {. \3 t3 U! J- {* G$ ]% | [# m
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was+ i W+ F4 d* w! _' l
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
5 t) U. E/ W- gDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
' U/ T3 e" q( Q7 |/ c$ `( R) d( n. C/ gcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to# [4 L0 Y1 n: p4 B# t
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.( ^6 n- l. [. g2 x( B
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
$ _0 G. s1 n0 W: c' n6 D' ~4 Wbaseline value in those females who were exposed to7 ~ @/ e$ b! ?) y
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
, R/ |3 `: A6 i( a, Lpartners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-9 S* d9 P2 A+ C% B W4 a
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
4 Q; g, x, N6 q1 lOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
8 _6 f) r* K# K5 ]which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that! V' [+ Y4 x) L: S
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
. V$ C: S9 [( c0 G( r8 M5 v/ p. t& Aterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
! }+ F9 K$ K1 S E4 Z: Nactive in young children exposed to testosterone
! \5 n! I1 C6 p# P% w8 Q8 T/ fexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-
/ R& h+ H+ {9 J. C! z* a, g O+ |drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
. V& \2 N6 I: g1 B9 X" Z P/ K! ivirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
9 r' V8 E0 z; }5 E2 ?4 Q Uchildren results in an increase in growth velocity and% y( p9 G( o& k( d V' B2 p5 L" r
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.; S: x. p2 v( h, C8 G" R
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during- T5 }/ [5 i \! N
early childhood on pubertal development and final. l' R) u1 |4 t0 q5 S9 l9 l% I
adult height are not fully known and always remain
) i" k# d( G& h3 E$ za concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
$ C* W3 z# U+ E' l5 ?terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
4 H; |3 b( {9 V' Q3 Lacceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after* |/ u+ H! c& Z8 q% M6 n
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation- H: L4 r+ Y/ w0 v" O7 L
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
* ]1 Z" S; w/ K: b/ MThere are conflicting reports and controversy% C, [. M- a: u
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult o% w7 }8 H2 U# ?
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
# d6 _7 ?9 X. S& P1 {5 C/ E1 Badult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
' J: `! b3 H! }- U% [( Dulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However, o; ]. }2 G1 B0 N t( e' O" Y* }
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
/ k4 e+ T- r8 @8 C& F% c6 L7 _1 Ichildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult5 r) y- K( s/ j$ o- X* A2 ^
penile length in clinical studies.1 L+ T T/ g2 G c; ^& ?/ |# o$ X; ~
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
$ i# b1 N( ~! }: A) l/ T/ A7 N0 J Igoing to experience any of the untoward effects from
# U7 R8 I1 T1 i1 _7 K* ftestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
# ~5 b( @- ]' k, t0 Tthe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
! t, t! j2 V* h2 r% jAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of. r: D) r+ r5 i; Y
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at
$ I: T, q% z9 A5 b6 ~* Othe follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
. r' G. ]/ e/ N' _& x$ w% {* ^- gheight will not be affected.
0 j6 w6 c8 W* pAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-
% c y5 w0 ]( c$ l( U$ gability of androgen products in our society may
4 S+ O. W6 [- T9 D' T! \indeed cause more virilization in male or female
) {# r" o# K" Z1 z5 Z" A' l. w7 vchildren than one would realize. Exposure to andro-/ H8 {. K9 }# y. ?, r
gen products must be considered and specific ques-" g, E+ Q' l# k( _
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or
. ]7 a: v( N+ v# S# j0 ~& w& X* C) \gel should be asked of the family members during1 _) c( X9 X' A0 X* X: o9 }
the evaluation of any children who present with vir-
. w2 d4 I8 `+ ]3 U* Vilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-- c2 j2 g" L; v- R5 ^7 Q: Q( Z) I
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
- o$ U" {5 t0 L9 e6 t1 \/ ?# Yappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
) O0 |2 z( E$ D9 G* chistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
8 e, Y) p5 @% D0 ?+ @result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive* v' L7 ~) d3 `. G+ |* U' H
investigation. The primary care physician should be7 S' r& Z9 H9 M! f3 ?1 y6 }
aware of this fact, because most of these children8 x' [& [6 P6 c! ~& i; Q3 ~
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
5 K# Y7 w, Y, M tDesk Reference and package insert should also put a- N3 [2 k) J# H0 S! x, B! B4 \
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
: F4 ?9 f& Z kfemale child who might come in contact with some-
2 W. u; R! @# L1 Aone using any of these products.0 E, A3 k3 I8 x$ S0 e
References
' U% I2 y5 q1 A8 R: H3 m) V1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation7 [& B5 E* j. F$ Q) N" V6 |
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric* |" W2 p: B+ p: S
Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
v) \% n- ~) Z. e1 ~" x2002: 565-628.
4 n# h. K3 f% g6 g, i# {2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
% A- l: _4 p% Dpuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|